Shoop | A Professional Law Corporation 866-884-1717
Home Attorney Bios
David Shoop
Don Liddy
 Our Results Frequently Asked Questions Referrals Contact Us
Click here if you have been injured by a defective product. Learn more about our results and experience. Press & News Let us evaluate your case immediately.
Product Defect Areas of Practice
Product Liability
Advanced Bionics Recall
Asbestos Claims
Automobile Defects
Brain Injuries
Breach of Warranty
Cal-OSHA Non-Compliance
Catastrophic Injuries
Cochlear Implant Recall
Commercial & Residential Fires
Construction Products
Crib Recalls
Dangerous Infant Products
Dangerous Products
Defective Machinery
DePuy ASR Hip Recall
Failure to Warn
Farm Machinery
Food Poisoning
Industrial Equipment
Medical Devices
Product Defects
Product Recalls
Proving Negligence
Residential & Commercial Fires
Seat Belt Failure
Strict Products Liability
Tractors
Wrongful Death
Zimmer Durom Cup Hip Implant Device
866-884-1717

Blog Posts in May, 2011

Zimmer Durom Cup Failure Rates

Posted on May 3, 2011 By Shoop | A Professional Law Corporation
Zimmer Holdings, one of the nation's largest producers of orthopedic devices, announced in July of 2008 that it was suspending sales of its artificial hip implant component due to a high failure ...
Continue reading "Zimmer Durom Cup Failure Rates" »
Permalink

Attorney David Shoop Summits Mt. Kilimanjaro

Posted on May 3, 2011 By Shoop | A Professional Law Corporation
Attorney David Shoop, founder of SHOOP | A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION, recently summited Mt. Kilimanjaro in Tanzania, Africa. The summit of Kilimanjaro is the highest point on the African continent, ...
Continue reading "Attorney David Shoop Summits Mt. Kilimanjaro" »
Permalink
Los Angeles Product Liability Attorney | Contact Us | Site Map | Privacy Policy

Attorney Web Design


The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.